Archive for February 3rd, 2008|Daily archive page
Top Teams – Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency
I have already brought to you the most offensively efficient players on the Kentucky Wildcat roster but how does the overall team compare to the best in the nation? Is Kentucky more efficient on offense than the likes of Memphis, North Carolina and UCLA? Does UK have the stingiest SEC defense? Find out by looking at the rankings below. Please not that I could not find the necessary information on 3 top teams. I do not list Kansas State, Drake or Duke, so please take into account their absences.
Formulas
The formula used to find the offensive efficiency was this:
Points per game/Possessions per game*100.
| Kentucky | 60.83086632 | 1277.448193 | 118.1965741 |
| Memphis | 72.06396569 | 1513.34328 | 112.8164391 |
| Louisville | 66.62692806 | 1465.792417 | 108.3645939 |
| Duke | 77.1810143 | 1543.620286 | 110.9081045 |
| North Carolina | 76.24553013 | 1601.156133 | 119.8758797 |
| Tennessee | 73.06191633 | 1534.300243 | 116.3396805 |
| Kansas | 66.95050039 | 1472.911009 | 123.9721877 |
| UCLA | 59.51221741 | 1309.268783 | 127.3688048 |
| Kansas State | 71.66722696 | 1505.011766 | 112.6037708 |
| Georgetown | 59.92603175 | 1258.446667 | 120.4818639 |
| Drake | 59.3045608 | 1245.395777 | 123.5992629 |
| Butler | 59.63760531 | 1252.389712 | 115.6988106 |
| Florida | 67.3021665 | 1480.647663 | 120.5013215 |
| Michigan State | 65.61398268 | 1443.507619 | 112.7808387 |
| Texas A&M | 67.152948 | 1477.364856 | 112.8766529 |
| Texas | 61.79368929 | 1359.461164 | 126.2264819 |
| Vanderbilt | 74.14971003 | 1631.293621 | 111.2613926 |
| VMI | 84.36339551 | 1687.26791 | 109.2891051 |
| Indiana | 68.16262559 | 1363.252512 | 113.11184 |
| Saint Mary’s | 72.14955422 | 1515.140639 | 107.6929731 |
| Xavier | 65.7368029 | 1446.209664 | 118.9592383 |
| Stanford | 64.16781221 | 1347.524056 | 110.4915339 |
| Washington State | 60.87750921 | 1278.427693 | 111.5354437 |
| Baylor | 71.31441931 | 1426.288386 | 113.1608457 |
| Connecticut | 70.16608219 | 1473.487726 | 112.3049735 |
The formula used to find the defensive efficiency was this:
Opponents points per game/Opponents possessions per game*100.
| Memphis | 71.78605939 | 1507.507247 | 83.99959617 |
| Indiana | 71.3116962 | 1426.233924 | 87.082489 |
| UCLA | 64.51029486 | 1419.226487 | 89.59810233 |
| Stanford | 63.81598095 | 1340.1356 | 89.63272075 |
| Kansas | 66.52322705 | 1463.510995 | 89.74309072 |
| Saint Mary’s | 69.09382418 | 1450.970308 | 91.46982491 |
| Louisville | 66.22398399 | 1456.927648 | 91.50763266 |
| Washington State | 58.7091089 | 1232.891287 | 93.17123191 |
| Texas A&M | 66.23371958 | 1457.141831 | 93.45692858 |
| North Carolina | 76.46361025 | 1605.735815 | 93.77009503 |
| Michigan State | 64.94812215 | 1428.858687 | 94.99889751 |
| Xavier | 64.96905928 | 1429.319304 | 95.58396056 |
| Tennessee | 72.15981052 | 1515.356021 | 96.17541884 |
| Connecticut | 70.82570914 | 1487.339892 | 96.99867581 |
| Baylor | 71.69673077 | 1433.934615 | 97.49398508 |
| Georgetown | 55.82536374 | 1172.332638 | 101.5667363 |
| Vanderbilt | 74.08065508 | 1629.774412 | 102.5908855 |
| VMI | 84.21156443 | 1684.231289 | 102.8362323 |
| Butler | 55.10031952 | 1157.10671 | 105.0810603 |
| Florida | 61.15559958 | 1345.423191 | 105.4686741 |
| Texas | 61.85808213 | 1360.877807 | 105.5642169 |
| Kentucky | 60.67795567 | 1274.237069 | 109.7597954 |
Also note that on the defensive efficiency that the lower the number the better the efficiency. It is opposite for offensive efficiency. Please comment this entry to give your input for any other formulas or ways to present the teams or email me at ukmadness1@yahoo.com.
Leave a Comment